↓ Skip to main content

Simulating Arctic Climate Warmth and Icefield Retreat in the Last Interglaciation

Overview of attention for article published in Science, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
790 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
722 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simulating Arctic Climate Warmth and Icefield Retreat in the Last Interglaciation
Published in
Science, March 2006
DOI 10.1126/science.1120808
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bette L. Otto-Bliesner, Shawn J. Marshall, Jonathan T. Overpeck, Gifford H. Miller, Aixue Hu, CAPE Last Interglacial Project members

Abstract

In the future, Arctic warming and the melting of polar glaciers will be considerable, but the magnitude of both is uncertain. We used a global climate model, a dynamic ice sheet model, and paleoclimatic data to evaluate Northern Hemisphere high-latitude warming and its impact on Arctic icefields during the Last Interglaciation. Our simulated climate matches paleoclimatic observations of past warming, and the combination of physically based climate and ice-sheet modeling with ice-core constraints indicate that the Greenland Ice Sheet and other circum-Arctic ice fields likely contributed 2.2 to 3.4 meters of sea-level rise during the Last Interglaciation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 722 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
Brazil 7 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Norway 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Other 15 2%
Unknown 668 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 176 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 159 22%
Student > Master 78 11%
Student > Bachelor 53 7%
Professor 45 6%
Other 133 18%
Unknown 78 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 227 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 224 31%
Environmental Science 80 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 4%
Arts and Humanities 14 2%
Other 48 7%
Unknown 103 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,481,082
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Science
#23,860
of 83,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,646
of 89,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#65
of 322 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 322 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.