You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The efficacy of salvage logging in reducing subsequent fire severity in conifer‐dominated forests of Minnesota, USA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1890/11-0380.1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shawn Fraver, Theresa Jain, John B. Bradford, Anthony W. D'Amato, Doug Kastendick, Brian Palik, Doug Shinneman, John Stanovick |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 31% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 24 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2011.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#2,890
of 3,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,506
of 136,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#26
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.