↓ Skip to main content

Keeping track of time: evidence for episodic-like memory in great apes

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Keeping track of time: evidence for episodic-like memory in great apes
Published in
Animal Cognition, September 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10071-009-0282-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gema Martin-Ordas, Daniel Haun, Fernando Colmenares, Josep Call

Abstract

Episodic memory, as defined by Tulving, can be described in terms of behavioural elements (what, where and when information) but it is also accompanied by an awareness of one's past (chronesthesia) and a subjective conscious experience (autonoetic awareness). Recent experiments have shown that corvids and rodents recall the where, what and when of an event. This capability has been called episodic-like memory because it only fulfils the behavioural criteria for episodic memory. We tested seven chimpanzees, three orangutans and two bonobos of various ages by adapting two paradigms, originally developed by Clayton and colleagues to test scrub jays. In Experiment 1, subjects were fed preferred but perishable food (frozen juice) and less preferred but non-perishable food (grape). After the food items were hidden, subjects could choose one of them either after 5 min or 1 h. The frozen juice was still available after 5 min but melted after 1 h and became unobtainable. Apes chose the frozen juice significantly more after 5 min and the grape after 1 h. In Experiment 2, subjects faced two baiting events happening at different times, yet they formed an integrated memory for the location and time of the baiting event for particular food items. We also included a memory task that required no temporal encoding. Our results showed that apes remember in an integrated fashion what, where and when (i.e., how long ago) an event happened; that is, apes distinguished between different events in which the same food items were hidden in different places at different times. The temporal control of their choices was not dependent on the familiarity of the platforms where the food was hidden. Chimpanzees' and bonobos' performance in the temporal encoding task was age-dependent, following an inverted U-shaped distribution. The age had no effect on the performance of the subjects in the task that required no temporal encoding.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 2%
United States 3 1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 237 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 24%
Student > Bachelor 39 15%
Researcher 38 15%
Student > Master 37 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 5%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 26 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 82 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 31%
Neuroscience 13 5%
Environmental Science 9 4%
Philosophy 7 3%
Other 31 12%
Unknown 32 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#637,743
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#162
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,542
of 93,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them