| Title |
The SWAL–QOL and SWAL–CARE Outcomes Tool for Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Adults: III. Documentation of Reliability and Validity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dysphagia, April 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00455-001-0109-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Colleen A. McHorney, JoAnne Robbins, Kevin Lomax, John C. Rosenbek, Kimberly Chignell, Amy E. Kramer, D. Earl Bricker |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 470 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 463 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 90 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 58 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 10% |
| Researcher | 35 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 90 | 19% |
| Unknown | 121 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 134 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 83 | 18% |
| Linguistics | 29 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 57 | 12% |
| Unknown | 142 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,559,757
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#386
of 1,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,640
of 130,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.