↓ Skip to main content

Modelling the potential spread of Fusarium circinatum, the causal agent of pitch canker in Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Forest Science , July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Modelling the potential spread of Fusarium circinatum, the causal agent of pitch canker in Europe
Published in
Annals of Forest Science , July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13595-014-0412-2
Authors

Timo Möykkynen, Paolo Capretti, Timo Pukkala

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 44%
Environmental Science 9 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 12 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2014.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#894
of 1,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,726
of 243,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.