You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Defining the residual risk of adverse perinatal outcome in growth-restricted fetuses with normal umbilical artery blood flow
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.033 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vicky O’Dwyer, Gerard Burke, Julia Unterscheider, Sean Daly, Michael P. Geary, Mairead M. Kennelly, Fionnuala M. McAuliffe, Keelin O’Donoghue, Alyson Hunter, John J. Morrison, Patrick Dicker, Elizabeth C. Tully, Fergal D. Malone |
| Abstract |
To determine the cause of adverse perinatal outcome in fetal growth restriction(FGR) where umbilical artery Doppler(UA) was normal, as identified from the Prospective Observational Trial to Optimize Pediatric Health(PORTO). We compared cases of adverse outcome where UA Doppler was normal and abnormal. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 57% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,047,316
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#5,590
of 13,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,141
of 240,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#36
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.