↓ Skip to main content

Lack of repeatable differential expression patterns between MON810 and comparable commercial varieties of maize

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Molecular Biology, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Lack of repeatable differential expression patterns between MON810 and comparable commercial varieties of maize
Published in
Plant Molecular Biology, July 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11103-008-9355-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Coll, Anna Nadal, Montserrat Palaudelmàs, Joaquima Messeguer, Enric Melé, Pere Puigdomènech, Maria Pla

Abstract

The introduction of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in many countries follows strict regulations to assure that only products that have been safety tested in relation to human health and the environment are marketed. Thus, GMOs must be authorized before use. By complementing more targeted approaches, profiling methods can assess possible unintended effects of transformation. We used microarrays to compare the transcriptome profiles of widely commercialized maize MON810 varieties and their non-GM near-isogenic counterparts. The expression profiles of MON810 seedlings are more similar to those of their corresponding near-isogenic varieties than are the profiles of other lines produced by conventional breeding. However, differential expression of approximately 1.7 and approximately 0.1% of transcripts was identified in two variety pairs (AristisBt/Aristis and PR33P67/PR33P66) that had similar cryIA(b) mRNA levels, demonstrating that commercial varieties of the same event have different similarity levels to their near-isogenic counterparts without the transgene (note that these two pairs also show phenotypic differences). In the tissues, developmental stage and varieties analyzed, we could not identify any gene differentially expressed in all variety-pairs. However, a small set of sequences were differentially expressed in various pairs. Their relation to the transgenesis was not proven, although this is likely to be modulated by the genetic background of each variety.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Portugal 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
France 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 42 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 31%
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 55%
Environmental Science 5 10%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,595,536
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Plant Molecular Biology
#99
of 2,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,747
of 81,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Molecular Biology
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,846 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.