↓ Skip to main content

Origins and impact of the term ‘NSAID’

Overview of attention for article published in Inflammopharmacology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 666)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
25 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Origins and impact of the term ‘NSAID’
Published in
Inflammopharmacology, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10787-014-0211-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonas Kure Buer

Abstract

This article is an historical investigation of the term non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and its acronym NSAIDs. Drug names and categories tend to be taken at face value in everyday practice, as natural categories existing in their own right. The main argument of this article is that the term NSAID is a reminder that drug names and categories are complex cultural and social products that have been created by specific people, for specific purposes, through specific historical processes, and that this is relevant for their use today. The article locates the first appearances of the phrase non-steroidal at the entry to the 1960s, when the iatrogenic tragedies that followed from the introduction of corticosteroids had become apparent, and where a clear separation between these drugs and emerging anti-inflammatory alternatives was needed. The article then shows how both the phrase and the acronym appeared for the first time out of specific textual contexts in publications by Michael W. Whitehouse, before they were taken up by a wider community and transformed into concepts independent on the context of their first appearances.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 94 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 22%
Student > Master 19 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 12%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 23 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Chemistry 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 28 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#993,164
of 25,159,758 outputs
Outputs from Inflammopharmacology
#30
of 666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,541
of 235,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammopharmacology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,159,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.