↓ Skip to main content

Five Un‐Easy Pieces of Pharmaceutical Policy Reform

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Five Un‐Easy Pieces of Pharmaceutical Policy Reform
Published in
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January 2021
DOI 10.1111/jlme.12067
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc A Rodwin

Abstract

Improper dependencies slant policy over a drug's life span, biasing the development of new drugs, the testing and marketing approval for new drugs, and the monitoring of patient safety after drugs are marketed. This article examines five ways in which the public improperly depends on pharmaceutical firms that compromise the integrity of pharmaceutical policy. Today the public relies on pharmaceutical firms: (1) to set priorities on drug research and development; (2) to conduct clinical trials to test whether drugs are safe and effective; (3) to decide what clinical trial data to disclose to the public; (4) to monitor post marketing drug safety; (5) to supply product information to physicians and to finance continuing medical education and other professional activities. The article suggests options to overcome each of these dependencies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Netherlands 1 4%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Other 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 22%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 22%