You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Can Mass Drug Administration Lead to the Sustainable Control of Schistosomiasis?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Infectious Diseases, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1093/infdis/jiu416 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Allen G. P. Ross, Remigio M. Olveda, Delia Chy, David U. Olveda, Yuesheng Li, Donald A. Harn, Darren J. Gray, Donald P. McManus, Veronica Tallo, Thao N. P. Chau, Gail M. Williams |
Abstract |
In the Philippines, the current national control strategy for schistosomiasis is annual mass drug administration (MDA) with 40 mg/kg of praziquantel in all schistosomiasis-endemic villages with a prevalence ≥10%. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 119 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 25 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 17% |
Researcher | 17 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Other | 14 | 12% |
Unknown | 22 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 27% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 4% |
Other | 21 | 18% |
Unknown | 26 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2015.
All research outputs
#15,739,010
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#11,989
of 14,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,015
of 239,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#65
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.