↓ Skip to main content

Physiotherapists' Beliefs About Whiplash‐associated Disorder: A Comparison Between Singapore and Queensland, Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Physiotherapy Research International, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physiotherapists' Beliefs About Whiplash‐associated Disorder: A Comparison Between Singapore and Queensland, Australia
Published in
Physiotherapy Research International, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/pri.1598
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tze Siong Ng, Ashley Pedler, Bill Vicenzino, Michele Sterling

Abstract

Healthcare providers' beliefs may play a role in the outcome of whiplash-associated disorders (WAD), a condition which is proposed to be culturally dependent. Clinical practice guidelines recommend an active approach for the management of WAD, which is often delivered by physiotherapists. However, there is no data on physiotherapists' whiplash beliefs. Our primary objective was to determine physiotherapists' beliefs from Queensland (Australia) and Singapore, two cultures with differing prevalence of chronic musculoskeletal pain and chronic WAD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 17 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 21%
Psychology 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 21 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Physiotherapy Research International
#393
of 441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,896
of 239,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physiotherapy Research International
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.