↓ Skip to main content

Biochemical and molecular characterization of Cronobacter spp. (formerly Enterobacter sakazakii) isolated from foods

Overview of attention for article published in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Biochemical and molecular characterization of Cronobacter spp. (formerly Enterobacter sakazakii) isolated from foods
Published in
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10482-010-9484-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Imrich Turcovský, Kristína Kuniková, Hana Drahovská, Eva Kaclíková

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify and characterize Cronobacter spp. isolated from a range of foods. A total of 71 Cronobacter strains were isolated from 602 foods in our laboratory. The highest contamination was observed in foods of plant origin, e.g. spices, teas, chocolate, nuts, pastries and vegetables. On the basis of genus and species identification performed using genus-specific PCR, 16S rRNA sequencing and AFLP genotyping, most of the strains belonged to Cronobacter sakazakii. Biochemical profiling by the tests included in API 20E, complemented with relevant additional tests, classified the strains into 13 biogroups. AFLP genotyping facilitated discrimination of six main groups at the 70% similarity level and strain grouping correlated clearly with species identification. Our results indicate that molecular typing by AFLP may be applied as a useful tool not only for direct comparison of Cronobacter isolates, providing traceability, but also for the reliable species classification. Moreover, tracing of these bacteria in a wider variety of foods should be important to enhance the knowledge of their transmission.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 41%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 15%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,480,951
of 23,917,011 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#158
of 2,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,645
of 83,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,917,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,074 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them