↓ Skip to main content

Systems toxicology approaches for understanding the joint effects of environmental chemical mixtures

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
290 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systems toxicology approaches for understanding the joint effects of environmental chemical mixtures
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, March 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.02.038
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J. Spurgeon, Oliver A.H. Jones, Jean-Lou C.M. Dorne, Claus Svendsen, Suresh Swain, Stephen R. Stürzenbaum

Abstract

Environmental mixtures of chemicals constitute a prevalent issue in ecotoxicology and the development of new methods to reduce the uncertainties associated with their ecological risk assessment is a critical research need. Historically, a number of models have been explored to predict the potential combined effects of chemicals on species. These models, especially concentration addition and the independent action, have been applied to a number of mixtures. While often providing a good prediction of joint effect, there are cases where these models can have limitations: notably in cases where there are interactions for which they fail to adequately predict joint effects. To support the better mechanistic understanding of interactions in mixture toxicology a framework to support experimental studies to investigate the basis of observed interactions is proposed. The conceptual framework is derived from the extension of a three stage scheme which has previously been applied to understand chemical bioavailability. The framework considers that interactions in mixtures result from processes related to 1) the speciation, binding and transport of chemicals in the exposure medium (external exposure); 2) the adsorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of chemicals within the organisms (toxicokinetics); 3) associations governing the binding and toxicity of the chemical(s) at the target site (toxicodynamics). The current state of the art in (eco)toxicology in relation to investigation of the mechanisms of interactions between chemicals is discussed with particular emphasis towards the multi-disciplinary tools and techniques within environmental chemistry; toxicology; biochemistry and systems biology that can be used to address such effects.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 4 1%
Brazil 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 267 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 25%
Researcher 65 22%
Student > Master 43 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 9%
Other 14 5%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 35 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 29%
Environmental Science 73 25%
Chemistry 16 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 3%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 61 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,621,995
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#11,479
of 29,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,510
of 103,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#14
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.