↓ Skip to main content

Organogenesis and functional genomics of the endocrine pancreas

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Organogenesis and functional genomics of the endocrine pancreas
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00018-011-0915-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nuria C. Bramswig, Klaus H. Kaestner

Abstract

Functional genomics, the analysis of the wealth of data produced by genome-wide analyses of gene expression, protein-protein, and protein-DNA interactions, has revolutionized biomedical research. Our ability to determine global gene expression profiles, transcription factor-binding sites, and histone modification maps using microarray-based technologies and next-generation sequencing applications has greatly enhanced our understanding of gene regulatory networks and the molecular wiring diagrams of cells and tissues. The organogenesis of the endocrine pancreas involves numerous signaling events within the endoderm-derived pancreatic epithelium and the surrounding mesenchyme, as well as complex transcription factor networks. Detailed understanding of the differentiation process from foregut endoderm to mature endocrine cells has enabled the rational design of in vitro differentiation protocols that coax embryonic stem cells into β-like cells that might enable cell replacement therapy for diabetes in the future. In this review, we summarize the research studies that have utilized genomic tools to elucidate endocrine pancreatic organogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 24%
Researcher 14 24%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 7 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2014.
All research outputs
#19,201,293
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#3,458
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,556
of 247,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.