Title |
Hardware-related infections after deep brain stimulation surgery: review of incidence, severity and management in 212 single-center procedures in the first year after implantation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Neurochirurgica, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00701-011-1130-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Massimo Piacentino, Manuela Pilleri, Luigi Bartolomei |
Abstract |
Device-related infection is a common occurrence after deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery, and may result in additional interventions and a loss of efficacy of therapy. This retrospective review aimed to evaluate the incidence, severity and management of device-related infections in 212 DBS procedures performed in our institute. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 40 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 8 | 19% |
Researcher | 8 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Other | 9 | 21% |
Unknown | 3 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 40% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 12% |
Engineering | 4 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
Psychology | 2 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2011.
All research outputs
#18,295,723
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#1,524
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,936
of 123,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.