| Title |
The effect of various cold-water immersion protocols on exercise-induced inflammatory response and functional recovery from high-intensity sprint exercise
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-014-2954-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gillian E. White, Shawn G. Rhind, Greg D. Wells |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different cold-water immersion (CWI) protocols on the inflammatory response to and functional recovery from high-intensity exercise. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 32% |
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 63% |
| Scientists | 10 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 207 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 10% |
| Researcher | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 16% |
| Unknown | 49 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 75 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 56 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,466,657
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#468
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,369
of 239,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#5
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.