You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Gastroesophageal Reflux in Relation to Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagus: A Pooled Analysis from the Barrett’s and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Consortium (BEACON)
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0103508 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael B. Cook, Douglas A. Corley, Liam J. Murray, Linda M. Liao, Farin Kamangar, Weimin Ye, Marilie D. Gammon, Harvey A. Risch, Alan G. Casson, Neal D. Freedman, Wong-Ho Chow, Anna H. Wu, Leslie Bernstein, Olof Nyrén, Nirmala Pandeya, David C. Whiteman, Thomas L. Vaughan |
Abstract |
Previous studies have evidenced an association between gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA). It is unknown to what extent these associations vary by population, age, sex, body mass index, and cigarette smoking, or whether duration and frequency of symptoms interact in predicting risk. The Barrett's and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Consortium (BEACON) allowed an in-depth assessment of these issues. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 115 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 12% |
Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
Other | 11 | 9% |
Other | 28 | 24% |
Unknown | 24 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 49% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 11% |
Unknown | 27 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2014.
All research outputs
#15,303,385
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#130,438
of 194,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,209
of 228,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,848
of 4,724 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,724 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.