↓ Skip to main content

Is Aquaculture Pro-Poor? Empirical Evidence of Impacts on Fish Consumption in Bangladesh

Overview of attention for article published in World Development, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
14 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
328 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is Aquaculture Pro-Poor? Empirical Evidence of Impacts on Fish Consumption in Bangladesh
Published in
World Development, December 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.06.035
Authors

Kazi Ali Toufique, Ben Belton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 318 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 63 19%
Researcher 50 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 52 16%
Unknown 74 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 95 29%
Social Sciences 37 11%
Environmental Science 37 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 23 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 4%
Other 35 11%
Unknown 89 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#391,428
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from World Development
#73
of 5,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,470
of 369,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Development
#2
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.