| Title |
Normative data for the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quality of Life Research, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11136-014-0763-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suzanne Breeman, Seonaidh Cotton, Shona Fielding, Gareth T. Jones |
| Abstract |
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is widely used in both research and clinical contexts. However, UK normative data from HADS remain limited. In our recent review of the literature, only six reports from four studies were identified as reporting UK normative data and all had limitations. The aim of our study was to use a large population-based dataset to address this. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 75% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 16% |
| Researcher | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 27 | 19% |
| Unknown | 23 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 26% |
| Psychology | 37 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2015.
All research outputs
#13,410,980
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#1,309
of 2,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,605
of 229,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#15
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,842 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.