↓ Skip to main content

Misuse and Abuse of Pregabalin and Gabapentin: Cause for Concern?

Overview of attention for article published in CNS Drugs, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
13 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
195 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
Title
Misuse and Abuse of Pregabalin and Gabapentin: Cause for Concern?
Published in
CNS Drugs, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40263-014-0164-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabrizio Schifano

Abstract

Gabapentinoids (e.g. pregabalin and gabapentin) are widely used in neurology, psychiatry and primary healthcare but are increasingly being reported as possessing a potential for misuse. In fact, increasing levels of both prescriptions and related fatalities, together with an anecdotally growing black market, have been reported from a range of countries. This article reviews the current evidence base of this potential, in an attempt to answer the question of whether there is cause for concern about these drugs. Potent binding of pregabalin/gabapentin at the calcium channel results in a reduction in the release of excitatory molecules. Furthermore, gabapentinoids are thought to possess GABA-mimetic properties whilst possibly presenting with direct/indirect effects on the dopaminergic 'reward' system. Overall, pregabalin is characterized by higher potency, quicker absorption rates and greater bioavailability levels than gabapentin. Although at therapeutic dosages gabapentinoids may present with low addictive liability levels, misusers' perceptions for these molecules to constitute a valid substitute for most common illicit drugs may be a reason of concern. Gabapentinoid experimenters are profiled here as individuals with a history of recreational polydrug misuse, who self-administer with dosages clearly in excess (e.g. up to 3-20 times) of those that are clinically advisable. Physicians considering prescribing gabapentinoids for neurological/psychiatric disorders should carefully evaluate a possible previous history of drug abuse, whilst being able to promptly identify signs of pregabalin/gabapentin misuse and provide possible assistance in tapering off the medication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 205 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 15%
Researcher 30 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Other 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 47 22%
Unknown 50 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 36 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 57 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#859,606
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from CNS Drugs
#63
of 1,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,930
of 242,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CNS Drugs
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.