↓ Skip to main content

Pathogenic Variants for Mendelian and Complex Traits in Exomes of 6,517 European and African Americans: Implications for the Return of Incidental Results

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Human Genetics, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
39 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathogenic Variants for Mendelian and Complex Traits in Exomes of 6,517 European and African Americans: Implications for the Return of Incidental Results
Published in
American Journal of Human Genetics, July 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.07.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Holly K. Tabor, Paul L. Auer, Seema M. Jamal, Jessica X. Chong, Joon-Ho Yu, Adam S. Gordon, Timothy A. Graubert, Christopher J. O’Donnell, Stephen S. Rich, Deborah A. Nickerson, NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, Michael J. Bamshad

Abstract

Exome sequencing (ES) is rapidly being deployed for use in clinical settings despite limited empirical data about the number and types of incidental results (with potential clinical utility) that could be offered for return to an individual. We analyzed deidentified ES data from 6,517 participants (2,204 African Americans and 4,313 European Americans) from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Exome Sequencing Project. We characterized the frequencies of pathogenic alleles in genes underlying Mendelian conditions commonly assessed by newborn-screening (NBS, n = 39) programs, genes associated with age-related macular degeneration (ARMD, n = 17), and genes known to influence drug response (PGx, n = 14). From these 70 genes, we identified 10,789 variants and curated them by manual review of OMIM, HGMD, locus-specific databases, or primary literature to a total of 399 validated pathogenic variants. The mean number of risk alleles per individual was 15.3. Every individual had at least five known PGx alleles, 99% of individuals had at least one ARMD risk allele, and 45% of individuals were carriers for at least one pathogenic NBS allele. The carrier burden for severe recessive childhood disorders was 0.57. Our results demonstrate that risk alleles of potential clinical utility for both Mendelian and complex traits are detectable in every individual. These findings highlight the necessity of developing guidelines and policies that consider the return of results to all individuals and underscore the need to develop innovative approaches and tools that enable individuals to exercise their choice about the return of incidental results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Spain 3 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 182 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 59 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 18%
Other 18 9%
Student > Master 14 7%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 31 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 32 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,130,310
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#615
of 5,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,011
of 239,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.