| Title |
Interdependent networks: vulnerability analysis and strategies to limit cascading failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal de Physique I, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1140/epjb/e2014-40876-y |
| Authors |
Gaihua Fu, Richard Dawson, Mehdi Khoury, Seth Bullock |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 24% |
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 35 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2014.
All research outputs
#1,325,697
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal de Physique I
#86
of 1,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,901
of 242,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal de Physique I
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.