You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Distribution and Medical Impact of Loss-of-Function Variants in the Finnish Founder Population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Genetics, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004494 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elaine T. Lim, Peter Würtz, Aki S. Havulinna, Priit Palta, Taru Tukiainen, Karola Rehnström, Tõnu Esko, Reedik Mägi, Michael Inouye, Tuuli Lappalainen, Yingleong Chan, Rany M. Salem, Monkol Lek, Jason Flannick, Xueling Sim, Alisa Manning, Claes Ladenvall, Suzannah Bumpstead, Eija Hämäläinen, Kristiina Aalto, Mikael Maksimow, Marko Salmi, Stefan Blankenberg, Diego Ardissino, Svati Shah, Benjamin Horne, Ruth McPherson, Gerald K. Hovingh, Muredach P. Reilly, Hugh Watkins, Anuj Goel, Martin Farrall, Domenico Girelli, Alex P. Reiner, Nathan O. Stitziel, Sekar Kathiresan, Stacey Gabriel, Jeffrey C. Barrett, Terho Lehtimäki, Markku Laakso, Leif Groop, Jaakko Kaprio, Markus Perola, Mark I. McCarthy, Michael Boehnke, David M. Altshuler, Cecilia M. Lindgren, Joel N. Hirschhorn, Andres Metspalu, Nelson B. Freimer, Tanja Zeller, Sirpa Jalkanen, Seppo Koskinen, Olli Raitakari, Richard Durbin, Daniel G. MacArthur, Veikko Salomaa, Samuli Ripatti, Mark J. Daly, Aarno Palotie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 14% |
| Finland | 5 | 5% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| France | 4 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 48% |
| Scientists | 40 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 363 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 89 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 85 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 59 | 16% |
| Unknown | 59 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 117 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 87 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 9% |
| Unknown | 67 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2023.
All research outputs
#401,591
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#235
of 8,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,411
of 240,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#5
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.