You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
So you need to start renal replacement therapy on your ICU patient?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care, January 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cacc.2005.11.001 |
| Authors |
Carole L. Foot, John F. Fraser |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Bahrain | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 28% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 16% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 59% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2014.
All research outputs
#6,753,240
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care
#40
of 378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,880
of 151,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 378 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them