↓ Skip to main content

Neuropathic pain symptoms on the modified painDETECT correlate with signs of central sensitization in knee osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
203 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuropathic pain symptoms on the modified painDETECT correlate with signs of central sensitization in knee osteoarthritis
Published in
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, September 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.joca.2013.06.023
Pubmed ID
Authors

J.R. Hochman, A.M. Davis, J. Elkayam, L. Gagliese, G.A. Hawker

Abstract

Clinical tools are needed to identify and target a neuropathic-like phenotype, which may be associated with central sensitization (CS), in osteoarthritis (OA). The modified painDETECT questionnaire (mPD-Q) has face and content validity for identifying neuropathic-like symptoms in knee OA. To further validate the mPD-Q, this study assessed the unknown relationship between mPD-Q scores and signs of CS on quantitative sensory testing (QST) in knee OA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 254 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 19%
Student > Master 37 14%
Researcher 34 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Student > Postgraduate 14 5%
Other 47 18%
Unknown 58 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 9%
Neuroscience 19 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Unspecified 9 3%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 72 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,110,911
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
#129
of 3,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,491
of 212,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
#6
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.