↓ Skip to main content

Research Review: Polygenic methods and their application to psychiatric traits

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
593 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
659 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Research Review: Polygenic methods and their application to psychiatric traits
Published in
Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, August 2014
DOI 10.1111/jcpp.12295
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naomi R. Wray, Sang Hong Lee, Divya Mehta, Anna A.E. Vinkhuyzen, Frank Dudbridge, Christel M. Middeldorp

Abstract

Despite evidence from twin and family studies for an important contribution of genetic factors to both childhood and adult onset psychiatric disorders, identifying robustly associated specific DNA variants has proved challenging. In the pregenomics era the genetic architecture (number, frequency and effect size of risk variants) of complex genetic disorders was unknown. Empirical evidence for the genetic architecture of psychiatric disorders is emerging from the genetic studies of the last 5 years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 659 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 646 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 160 24%
Researcher 116 18%
Student > Master 81 12%
Student > Bachelor 60 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 5%
Other 87 13%
Unknown 123 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 112 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 94 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 80 12%
Neuroscience 57 9%
Other 62 9%
Unknown 166 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,365,550
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry
#540
of 3,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,237
of 243,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry
#9
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.