↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic significance of serum lactate dehydrogenase level in osteosarcoma: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Prognostic significance of serum lactate dehydrogenase level in osteosarcoma: a meta-analysis
Published in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00432-014-1644-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jian Chen, Meng-xiong Sun, Ying-qi Hua, Zheng-dong Cai

Abstract

A number of studies have investigated the role of serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level in patients with osteosarcoma but have yielded inconsistent and inconclusive results. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess its prognostic value more precisely.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 8 14%
Other 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 14 25%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 45%
Engineering 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2014.
All research outputs
#16,049,105
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#1,504
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,533
of 227,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
#19
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.