↓ Skip to main content

SParticle, an algorithm for the analysis of filamentous microorganisms in submerged cultures

Overview of attention for article published in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
SParticle, an algorithm for the analysis of filamentous microorganisms in submerged cultures
Published in
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10482-017-0939-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joost Willemse, Ferhat Büke, Dino van Dissel, Sanne Grevink, Dennis Claessen, Gilles P. van Wezel

Abstract

Streptomycetes are filamentous bacteria that produce a plethora of bioactive natural products and industrial enzymes. Their mycelial lifestyle typically results in high heterogeneity in bioreactors, with morphologies ranging from fragments and open mycelial mats to dense pellets. There is a strong correlation between morphology and production in submerged cultures, with small and open mycelia favouring enzyme production, while most antibiotics are produced mainly in pellets. Here we describe SParticle, a Streptomyces Particle analysis method that combines whole slide imaging with automated image analysis to characterize the morphology of submerged grown Streptomyces cultures. SParticle allows the analysis of over a thousand particles per hour, offering a high throughput method for the imaging and statistical analysis of mycelial morphologies. The software is available as a plugin for the open source software ImageJ and allows users to create custom filters for other microbes. Therefore, SParticle is a widely applicable tool for the analysis of filamentous microorganisms in submerged cultures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Engineering 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Energy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2017.
All research outputs
#14,393,352
of 23,508,125 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#1,286
of 2,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,717
of 317,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,508,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,049 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.