You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of experimental manipulation on survival and recruitment of feral pigs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wildlife Research, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1071/wr08077 |
| Authors |
Laura B. Hanson, Michael S. Mitchell, James B. Grand, D. Buck Jolley, Bill D. Sparklin, Stephen S. Ditchkoff |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 22% |
| Researcher | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2015.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Research
#393
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,987
of 107,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them