| Title |
Low back pain in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of conservative interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-014-3461-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zoe A. Michaleff, Steven J. Kamper, Christopher G. Maher, Roni Evans, Carolyn Broderick, Nicholas Henschke |
| Abstract |
To identify and evaluate the effectiveness of conservative treatment approaches used in children and adolescents to manage and prevent low back pain (LBP). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 40% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Norway | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 264 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 11% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Researcher | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 57 | 21% |
| Unknown | 73 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 24 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 82 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,581,845
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#236
of 4,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,967
of 229,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#2
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,653 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.