↓ Skip to main content

Epigenetic dysregulation: a novel pathway of oncogenesis in pediatric brain tumors

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Epigenetic dysregulation: a novel pathway of oncogenesis in pediatric brain tumors
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00401-014-1325-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam M. Fontebasso, Tenzin Gayden, Hamid Nikbakht, Michael Neirinck, Simon Papillon-Cavanagh, Jacek Majewski, Nada Jabado

Abstract

A remarkably large number of "epigenetic regulators" have been recently identified to be altered in cancers and a rapidly expanding body of literature points to "epigenetic addiction" (an aberrant epigenetic state to which a tumor is addicted) as a new previously unsuspected mechanism of oncogenesis. Although mutations are also found in canonical signaling pathway genes, we and others identified chromatin-associated proteins to be more commonly altered by somatic alterations than any other class of oncoprotein in several subgroups of childhood high-grade brain tumors. Furthermore, as these childhood malignancies carry fewer non-synonymous somatic mutations per case in contrast to most adult cancers, these mutations are likely drivers in these tumors. Herein, we will use as examples of this novel hallmark of oncogenesis high-grade astrocytomas, including glioblastoma, and a subgroup of embryonal tumors, embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes (ETMR) to describe the novel molecular defects uncovered in these deadly tumors. We will further discuss evidence for their profound effects on the epigenome. The relative genetic simplicity of these tumors promises general insights into how mutations in the chromatin machinery modify downstream epigenetic signatures to drive transformation, and how to target this plastic genetic/epigenetic interface.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 77 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Other 6 8%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 13 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 19%
Computer Science 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2015.
All research outputs
#17,724,033
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#2,168
of 2,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,093
of 228,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#20
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.