| Title |
Water Footprint Symposium: where next for water footprint and water assessment methodology?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11367-014-0770-x |
| Authors |
Martin R. Tillotson, Junguo Liu, Dabo Guan, Pute Wu, Xu Zhao, Guoping Zhang, Stephan Pfister, Markus Pahlow |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 22% |
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 28 | 35% |
| Engineering | 14 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2014.
All research outputs
#14,218,560
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#762
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,106
of 231,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.