↓ Skip to main content

Brown Fat and the Myth of Diet-Induced Thermogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brown Fat and the Myth of Diet-Induced Thermogenesis
Published in
Cell Metabolism (Science Direct), April 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.03.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leslie P. Kozak

Abstract

The notion that brown adipose tissue (BAT) in mice or humans maintains energy balance by burning off excess calories seems incompatible with evolutionary biology. Studies in obese rats and mice lacking UCP1 indicate that diet-induced thermogenesis by BAT is unlikely.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Trinidad and Tobago 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 258 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 22%
Researcher 58 21%
Student > Master 29 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 27 10%
Student > Bachelor 26 9%
Other 50 18%
Unknown 29 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 109 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 49 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 14%
Neuroscience 11 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 41 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,389,715
of 25,556,408 outputs
Outputs from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#2,210
of 3,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,198
of 103,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Metabolism (Science Direct)
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,556,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 74.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.