↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Very Low Levels of Atherogenic Lipoproteins and the Risk for Cardiovascular Events A Meta-Analysis of Statin Trials

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
507 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
359 Mendeley
Title
Very Low Levels of Atherogenic Lipoproteins and the Risk for Cardiovascular Events A Meta-Analysis of Statin Trials
Published in
JACC, August 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.615
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Matthijs Boekholdt, G. Kees Hovingh, Samia Mora, Benoit J. Arsenault, Pierre Amarenco, Terje R. Pedersen, John C. LaRosa, David D. Waters, David A. DeMicco, R. John Simes, Antony C. Keech, David Colquhoun, Graham A. Hitman, D. John Betteridge, Michael B. Clearfield, John R. Downs, Helen M. Colhoun, Antonio M. Gotto, Paul M. Ridker, Scott M. Grundy, John J.P. Kastelein

Abstract

Levels of atherogenic lipoproteins achieved with statin therapy are highly variable, but the consequence of this variability for cardiovascular disease risk is not well-documented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 352 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 13%
Student > Master 41 11%
Researcher 35 10%
Other 34 9%
Student > Postgraduate 31 9%
Other 96 27%
Unknown 75 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 162 45%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 23 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Other 34 9%
Unknown 96 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
#736,208
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,844
of 17,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,842
of 243,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#15
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.