↓ Skip to main content

A scoping review of rehabilitation interventions that reduce fatigue among adults with multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Disability & Rehabilitation, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A scoping review of rehabilitation interventions that reduce fatigue among adults with multiple sclerosis
Published in
Disability & Rehabilitation, July 2014
DOI 10.3109/09638288.2014.944996
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miho Asano, Elizabeth Berg, Katherine Johnson, Merrill Turpin, Marcia L. Finlayson

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To identify and summarize available research literature about rehabilitation interventions for multiple sclerosis (MS) fatigue management. Methods: Database searches (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsychINFO) were conducted in October 2011 and last updated in July 2013. To be included, studies must have been published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, written in English and included an intervention to manage MS fatigue. Effect size (ES) were calculated for the quantitative studies to estimate intervention effects, and major themes were summarized for the qualitative studies. Results: Thirty-eight studies were included in this review. A variety of exercise and behavior change interventions were prescribed to adults with MS. The two most common interventions were progressive resistive training and fatigue management programs. Three exercise intervention studies and nine behavior change intervention studies with quantitative data presented significant ES. Four studies with qualitative data supported the positive impact of certain exercise and behavior change interventions. Conclusions: This review identified a variety of exercise and behavior change interventions for MS fatigue management. While the findings may provide helpful information to inform practice, future researchers need to develop and evaluate knowledge translation strategies to facilitate the application of this evidence to daily practice to advance MS rehabilitation care. Implications for Rehabilitation Both exercise and behavior change interventions demonstrate some degree of effectiveness for managing MS fatigue. Effect sizes for exercise and behavior change interventions are similar, although the populations examined are different. Overall, evidence for exercise focuses on people who are less disabled, while evidence for behavior change interventions includes a broader population. Future researchers need to develop and evaluate knowledge translation strategies that facilitate application of evidence in daily practice in order to advance MS rehabilitation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 149 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 16%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 34 23%
Unknown 30 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 36 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 15%
Psychology 16 11%
Neuroscience 10 7%
Sports and Recreations 7 5%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 40 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2015.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Disability & Rehabilitation
#2,927
of 4,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,361
of 239,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Disability & Rehabilitation
#44
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.