You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prioritizing Regions to Conserve a Specialist Folivore: Considering Probability of Occurrence, Food Resources, and Climate Change
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12125 |
| Authors |
Christine Adams‐Hosking, Clive A. McAlpine, Jonathan R. Rhodes, Patrick T. Moss, Hedley S. Grantham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 25 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 30% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 23 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,094,778
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#365
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,882
of 247,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.