| Title |
Host range and properties of Tomato chlorotic dwarf viroid
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Plant Pathology, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10658-008-9416-9 |
| Authors |
Yosuke Matsushita, Tomio Usugi, Shinya Tsuda |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 54% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 85% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2011.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#354
of 1,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,811
of 186,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,069 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.