↓ Skip to main content

Conformational analysis of the ΜΒΡ83–99 (Phe91) and ΜΒΡ83–99 (Tyr91) peptide analogues and study of their interactions with the HLA-DR2 and human TCR receptors by using Molecular Dynamics

Overview of attention for article published in Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Conformational analysis of the ΜΒΡ83–99 (Phe91) and ΜΒΡ83–99 (Tyr91) peptide analogues and study of their interactions with the HLA-DR2 and human TCR receptors by using Molecular Dynamics
Published in
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10822-011-9467-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Potamitis, M.-T. Matsoukas, T. Tselios, T. Mavromoustakos, S. Golič Grdadolnik

Abstract

The two new synthetic analogues of the MBP(83-99) epitope substituted at Lys(91) (primary TCR contact) with Phe [MBP(83-99) (Phe(91))] or Tyr [MBP(83-99) (Tyr(91))], have been structurally elucidated using 1D and 2D high resolution NMR studies. The conformational analysis of the two altered peptide ligands (APLs) has been performed and showed that they adopt a linear and extended conformation which is in agreement with the structural requirements of the peptides that interact with the HLA-DR2 and TCR receptors. In addition, Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations of the two analogues in complex with HLA-DR2 (DRA, DRB1*1501) and TCR were performed. Similarities and differences of the binding motif of the two analogues were observed which provide a possible explanation of their biological activity. Their differences in the binding mode in comparison with the MBP(83-99) epitope may also explain their antagonistic versus agonistic activity. The obtained results clearly indicate that substitutions in crucial amino acids (TCR contacts) in combination with the specific conformational characteristics of the MBP(83-99) immunodominant epitope lead to an alteration of their biological activity. These results make the rational drug design intriguing since the biological activity is very sensitive to the substitution and conformation of the mutated MBP epitopes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Student > Master 3 18%
Professor 2 12%
Other 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Computer Science 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2011.
All research outputs
#20,723,696
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#817
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,885
of 136,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.