↓ Skip to main content

Epigenetic drugs against cancer: an evolving landscape

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Epigenetic drugs against cancer: an evolving landscape
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00204-014-1315-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonella Di Costanzo, Nunzio Del Gaudio, Antimo Migliaccio, Lucia Altucci

Abstract

Alteration of the chromatin orchestra seems to play a critical role in cancer. In recent years, in-depth studies of epigenetic machinery and its deregulation have led to the development and use of a wide range of modulatory molecules directed not only at chromatin enzymes (histone acetyltransferases, histone deacetylases, histone methyltransferases, histone demethylases and DNA methyltransferases) but also toward the emerging class of chromatin-associated proteins, so-called "histone readers." Chromatin modifiers are attractive therapeutic targets for the development of new cancer therapies. Many are currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and used to treat different malignancies. Specifically, inhibitors of DNA methyltransferases, such as azacitidine and decitabine, have been approved for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome, while inhibitors of histone deacetylases, including vorinostat and romidepsin, have been approved for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. The bromodomain and extra-terminal inhibitors JQ1, IBET762 and IBET151 have performed extremely well in preclinical settings, suggesting that they may be promising molecules for the treatment of some type of tumors. This review focuses on epidrugs and their possible application, with particular emphasis on their mechanism of action as well as their present status in clinical and preclinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Slovakia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 81 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 21%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 16%
Chemistry 14 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 12 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,424,574
of 25,079,481 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#453
of 2,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,590
of 235,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,079,481 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.