↓ Skip to main content

Circulating levels and clinical implications of epithelial membrane antigen and cytokeratin-1 in women with breast cancer: can their ratio improve the results?

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Circulating levels and clinical implications of epithelial membrane antigen and cytokeratin-1 in women with breast cancer: can their ratio improve the results?
Published in
Tumor Biology, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13277-014-2375-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abdelfattah M. Attallah, Mohamed El-Far, Mohamed M. Omran, Sanaa O. Abdallah, Mohamed A. El-desouky, Ibrahim El-Dosoky, Mohamed A. Abdelrazek, Ahmed A. Attallah, Mohamed A. Elweresh, Gamal E. Abdel Hameed, Hadil A. Shawki, Karim S. Salama, Ahmed M. El-Waseef

Abstract

Immunohistochemical studies proved that the presence of breast cancer (BrCa) is accompanied by elevated levels of epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and decreased levels of cytokeratin-1 (CK1). We, therefore, hypothesize that the serum EMA/CK1 ratio may serve as a promising biomarker for early diagnosis of breast cancer. The circulating levels of EMA and CK1 were determined by Western blot and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in sera from 102 women with BrCa and 90 women as controls (40 with benign breast disease and 50 healthy). EMA at 130 kDa and CK1 at 67 kDa were identified, purified, and quantified in sera of BrCa patients using ELISA. EMA/CK1 ratio values were found to discriminate BrCa patients from controls (P < 0.0001) with high diagnostic ability (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.901, sensitivity = 82, specificity = 76). The sensitivity and specificity for early-stage (≤T2) BrCa were 72 and 76 %, respectively. The ratio values of patients with late-stage (>T2) tumors were significantly higher than those of patients with early-stage (≤T2) tumors. Moreover, higher grades (grades 2-3) were associated with higher values than grade 1 tumors. AUC values in different BrCa patients who had early stage, low grade, or size ≤2 cm were 0.855, 0.762, and 0.839, respectively. AUC values of patients with positive lymph node or positive distant metastasis were 0.907 and 0.913, respectively. We show for the first time the impact of serum EMA and CK1 ratio in BrCa detection. Differential EMA/CK1 values may serve as a diagnostic marker in early-stage breast cancer patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 25%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2017.
All research outputs
#18,375,478
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,370
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,218
of 228,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#63
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.