↓ Skip to main content

Fifth carpometacarpal fracture dislocations fixed with Meta-HUS®: a series of 31 cases

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Fifth carpometacarpal fracture dislocations fixed with Meta-HUS®: a series of 31 cases
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00590-014-1519-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hideaki Miyamoto, Mohamed Adi, Chihab Taleb, Ahmed Zemirline, Frédéric Bodin, André Gay, Sybille Facca, Philippe Liverneaux

Abstract

Fracture dislocations of the fifth carpometacarpal are usually treated by percutaneous K-wires despite occasional complications: displacement, stiffness, malunions, and arthritis. Our aims were to evaluate the use of locked K-wire fixation for these fracture dislocations. Our series includes 31 fracture dislocations, five extra-articular and 26 articular, 21 of which were at the base of the metacarpal, four at the hamate, and one involving both the hamate and the metacarpal. Mean tourniquet time was 22 min and irradiation 2 mGy. After reduction, an M4 M5 K-wire and a carpometacarpal wire were connected using an MetaHUS (®) connector. Immediate immobilization was allowed. Return to normal activity was resumed at 6.5 weeks. At around 15 months follow-up, mean pain score was 8.5, Quick DASH was 6.36, and overall grip strength was 92 %, TAM of the fifth ray was 96 % of the contralateral side. There were two displacements that were re-operated with good result, three superficial infections, and one case of stiffness. All fractures healed without arthritis. Overall, percutaneous K-wire and splinting of fracture dislocations of the fifth carpometacarpal joint is unstable, and internal fixation can cause adhesions and stiffness. Our results show that the percutaneous locked K-wire technique is a good alternative as it associates closed reduction with K-wire fixation and a solid fixation using an external connector. This technique allows immediate mobilization of the hand and removal of hardware in clinic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Postgraduate 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 45%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2014.
All research outputs
#20,233,547
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#538
of 873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,455
of 229,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 873 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.