↓ Skip to main content

Multiple Vantage Points on the Mental Health Effects of Mass Shootings

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
Title
Multiple Vantage Points on the Mental Health Effects of Mass Shootings
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11920-014-0469-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

James M. Shultz, Siri Thoresen, Brian W. Flynn, Glenn W. Muschert, Jon A. Shaw, Zelde Espinel, Frank G. Walter, Joshua B. Gaither, Yanira Garcia-Barcena, Kaitlin O’Keefe, Alyssa M. Cohen

Abstract

The phenomenon of mass shootings has emerged over the past 50 years. A high proportion of rampage shootings have occurred in the United States, and secondarily, in European nations with otherwise low firearm homicide rates; yet, paradoxically, shooting massacres are not prominent in the Latin American nations with the highest firearm homicide rates in the world. A review of the scientific literature from 2010 to early 2014 reveals that, at the individual level, mental health effects include psychological distress and clinically significant elevations in posttraumatic stress, depression, and anxiety symptoms in relation to the degree of physical exposure and social proximity to the shooting incident. Psychological repercussions extend to the surrounding affected community. In the aftermath of the deadliest mass shooting on record, Norway has been in the vanguard of intervention research focusing on rapid delivery of psychological support and services to survivors of the "Oslo Terror."Grounded on a detailed review of the clinical literature on the mental health effects of mass shootings, this paper also incorporates wide-ranging co-author expertise to delineate: 1) the patterning of mass shootings within the international context of firearm homicides, 2) the effects of shooting rampages on children and adolescents, 3) the psychological effects for wounded victims and the emergency healthcare personnel who care for them, 4) the disaster behavioral health considerations for preparedness and response, and 5) the media "framing" of mass shooting incidents in relation to the portrayal of mental health themes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 174 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Student > Master 23 13%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 11%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 38 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 14%
Social Sciences 22 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Arts and Humanities 6 3%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 48 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,223,022
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#138
of 1,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,307
of 229,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#6
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.