↓ Skip to main content

A framework for the interpretation of de novo mutation in human disease

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
48 X users
patent
16 patents
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
914 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
979 Mendeley
citeulike
13 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A framework for the interpretation of de novo mutation in human disease
Published in
Nature Genetics, September 2014
DOI 10.1038/ng.3050
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kaitlin E Samocha, Elise B Robinson, Stephan J Sanders, Christine Stevens, Aniko Sabo, Lauren M McGrath, Jack A Kosmicki, Karola Rehnström, Swapan Mallick, Andrew Kirby, Dennis P Wall, Daniel G MacArthur, Stacey B Gabriel, Mark DePristo, Shaun M Purcell, Aarno Palotie, Eric Boerwinkle, Joseph D Buxbaum, Edwin H Cook, Richard A Gibbs, Gerard D Schellenberg, James S Sutcliffe, Bernie Devlin, Kathryn Roeder, Benjamin M Neale, Mark J Daly

Abstract

Spontaneously arising (de novo) mutations have an important role in medical genetics. For diseases with extensive locus heterogeneity, such as autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), the signal from de novo mutations is distributed across many genes, making it difficult to distinguish disease-relevant mutations from background variation. Here we provide a statistical framework for the analysis of excesses in de novo mutation per gene and gene set by calibrating a model of de novo mutation. We applied this framework to de novo mutations collected from 1,078 ASD family trios, and, whereas we affirmed a significant role for loss-of-function mutations, we found no excess of de novo loss-of-function mutations in cases with IQ above 100, suggesting that the role of de novo mutations in ASDs might reside in fundamental neurodevelopmental processes. We also used our model to identify ∼1,000 genes that are significantly lacking in functional coding variation in non-ASD samples and are enriched for de novo loss-of-function mutations identified in ASD cases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 979 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Hong Kong 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Other 16 2%
Unknown 925 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 242 25%
Researcher 226 23%
Student > Master 80 8%
Student > Bachelor 64 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 51 5%
Other 188 19%
Unknown 128 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 322 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 249 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 113 12%
Neuroscience 44 4%
Computer Science 39 4%
Other 66 7%
Unknown 146 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#580,094
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#1,132
of 7,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,438
of 249,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#21
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.