↓ Skip to main content

Estimating ‘Costs’ for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Estimating ‘Costs’ for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, September 2012
DOI 10.2165/00019053-200826090-00005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alec Miners

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 121 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 22%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Other 12 9%
Professor 10 7%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 34%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 23 17%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 32 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#1,930
of 1,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,272
of 189,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#545
of 549 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 549 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.