↓ Skip to main content

Emergency Department Services Use Among Immigrant and Non-immigrant Groups in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Emergency Department Services Use Among Immigrant and Non-immigrant Groups in the United States
Published in
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10903-013-9802-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wassim Tarraf, William Vega, Hector M. González

Abstract

Immigrants have disproportionate lack of access to healthcare and insurance. Emergency departments could serve as a healthcare substitute and increased demand can negatively affect the US emergency services system. Medical Expenditures Panel Survey (2000-2008) data was modeled to compare emergency departments (ED) use between non-citizens, foreign-born (naturalized), and US-born citizens. Group differences were assessed using non-linear decomposition techniques. Non-citizens were less likely to use ED services (8.7 %) compared to naturalized immigrants (10.6 %) and US-born Americans (14.7 %). Differences in ED use persisted after adjusting for the Behavioral Model covariates. Healthcare need and insurance partially explained the differences in ED use between the groups. Between 2000 and 2008 non-citizen immigrants used markedly less ED services compared to US citizens, regardless of their nation of origin. We also found that demographic and healthcare need profiles contributed to the divergence in use patterns between groups. A less restrictive healthcare policy environment can potentially contribute to lower population disease burden and greater efficiencies in the US health care system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 21 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 12%
Psychology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 35 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,928,528
of 25,070,356 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#494
of 1,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,232
of 198,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,070,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.