↓ Skip to main content

Error reduction in molecular tagging velocimetry via image preprocessing

Overview of attention for article published in Experiments in Fluids, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Error reduction in molecular tagging velocimetry via image preprocessing
Published in
Experiments in Fluids, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00348-014-1802-9
Authors

Michael Caso, Douglas Bohl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 43%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 57%
Physics and Astronomy 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2014.
All research outputs
#18,375,478
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Experiments in Fluids
#619
of 1,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,198
of 230,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experiments in Fluids
#4
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,276 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.