↓ Skip to main content

It wears me out just imagining it! Mental imagery leads to muscle fatigue and diminished performance of isometric exercise

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Psychology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
42 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
It wears me out just imagining it! Mental imagery leads to muscle fatigue and diminished performance of isometric exercise
Published in
Biological Psychology, August 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.07.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey D. Graham, Michael W.L. Sonne, Steven R. Bray

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the aftereffects of self-generated mental imagery of an effortful task on physical self-control endurance and muscle fatigue. Participants performed two isometric handgrip endurance trials (50% of maximum contraction) separated by either an imagery manipulation or a quiet rest period. The imagery group showed greater negative changes in endurance performance from trial 1 to trial 2 (p=.003, d=0.87) and increased muscle activation at baseline (p=.01, d=0.73) and at 25% (p=.03, d=0.61) of the second endurance trial compared to controls. We conclude that imagined performance of an effortful task depletes self-control strength and contributes to muscle fatigue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 130 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Researcher 11 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 25 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 26%
Sports and Recreations 28 20%
Neuroscience 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 32 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,435,309
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from Biological Psychology
#146
of 1,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,018
of 241,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Psychology
#5
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.