↓ Skip to main content

Long-term results of thalidomide and dexamethasone (thal–dex) as therapy of first relapse in multiple myeloma

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Hematology, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Long-term results of thalidomide and dexamethasone (thal–dex) as therapy of first relapse in multiple myeloma
Published in
Annals of Hematology, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00277-011-1320-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Zamagni, Alessandro Petrucci, Patrizia Tosi, Paola Tacchetti, Giulia Perrone, Annamaria Brioli, Lucia Pantani, Beatrice Zannetti, Carolina Terragna, Michele Baccarani, Michele Cavo

Abstract

Thal-dex (TD) is an effective therapy for advanced MM. We evaluated TD as salvage treatment of MM patients at first relapse. Thal was given at a daily dose of 100 or 200 mg until progression. Dex was administered 160 mg/month. One hundred patients were enrolled. First line therapy included ASCT (72%) and conventional CHT (28%). Fifty-nine percent received a fixed thal dose of 100 mg/day. The most frequent adverse events were constipation (42%), peripheral neuropathy (58%, 5% grade 3), bradycardia (20%), skin rash (11%), and VTE (7%). Discontinuation of thal due to adverse events was recorded in eight patients. On ITT, 46% of patients achieved at least a PR. Median DOR was 28 months, median time to next therapy was 15.5 months. Median OS, TTP, and PFS were 43, 22, and 21 months, respectively. TTP and PFS were significantly longer for patients with at least PR to TD. TD was an effective salvage treatment for MM patients at first relapse, as demonstrated by durable disease control and prolonged OS. TD was well tolerated, as reflected by the long stay on treatment without disease progression (median 25 months) and a low discontinuation rate due to toxicity (8%).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 25%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 7 25%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2011.
All research outputs
#18,295,723
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Hematology
#1,431
of 2,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,976
of 125,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Hematology
#15
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.