↓ Skip to main content

Virtual Electrode Recording Tool for EXtracellular potentials (VERTEX): comparing multi-electrode recordings from simulated and biological mammalian cortical tissue

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Structure and Function, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Virtual Electrode Recording Tool for EXtracellular potentials (VERTEX): comparing multi-electrode recordings from simulated and biological mammalian cortical tissue
Published in
Brain Structure and Function, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00429-014-0793-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard J. Tomsett, Matt Ainsworth, Alexander Thiele, Mehdi Sanayei, Xing Chen, Marc A. Gieselmann, Miles A. Whittington, Mark O. Cunningham, Marcus Kaiser

Abstract

Local field potentials (LFPs) sampled with extracellular electrodes are frequently used as a measure of population neuronal activity. However, relating such measurements to underlying neuronal behaviour and connectivity is non-trivial. To help study this link, we developed the Virtual Electrode Recording Tool for EXtracellular potentials (VERTEX). We first identified a reduced neuron model that retained the spatial and frequency filtering characteristics of extracellular potentials from neocortical neurons. We then developed VERTEX as an easy-to-use Matlab tool for simulating LFPs from large populations (>100,000 neurons). A VERTEX-based simulation successfully reproduced features of the LFPs from an in vitro multi-electrode array recording of macaque neocortical tissue. Our model, with virtual electrodes placed anywhere in 3D, allows direct comparisons with the in vitro recording setup. We envisage that VERTEX will stimulate experimentalists, clinicians, and computational neuroscientists to use models to understand the mechanisms underlying measured brain dynamics in health and disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
France 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
India 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Belarus 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 105 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 24%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Professor 9 8%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 32 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 21%
Engineering 17 14%
Computer Science 12 10%
Physics and Astronomy 7 6%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 13 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2015.
All research outputs
#15,270,937
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Brain Structure and Function
#873
of 1,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,429
of 230,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Structure and Function
#18
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.