↓ Skip to main content

Multiple Chronic Conditions: Prevalence, Health Consequences, and Implications for Quality, Care Management, and Costs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
6 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
875 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
697 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Multiple Chronic Conditions: Prevalence, Health Consequences, and Implications for Quality, Care Management, and Costs
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, November 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11606-007-0322-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Vogeli, Alexandra E. Shields, Todd A. Lee, Teresa B. Gibson, William D. Marder, Kevin B. Weiss, David Blumenthal

Abstract

Persons with multiple chronic conditions are a large and growing segment of the US population. However, little is known about how chronic conditions cluster, and the ramifications of having specific combinations of chronic conditions. Clinical guidelines and disease management programs focus on single conditions, and clinical research often excludes persons with multiple chronic conditions. Understanding how conditions in combination impact the burden of disease and the costs and quality of care received is critical to improving care for the 1 in 5 Americans with multiple chronic conditions. This Medline review of publications examining somatic chronic conditions co-occurring with 1 or more additional specific chronic illness between January 2000 and March 2007 summarizes the state of our understanding of the prevalence and health challenges of multiple chronic conditions and the implications for quality, care management, and costs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 697 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Nigeria 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 677 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 122 18%
Student > Master 116 17%
Researcher 104 15%
Student > Bachelor 52 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 48 7%
Other 128 18%
Unknown 127 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 211 30%
Social Sciences 68 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 66 9%
Psychology 36 5%
Computer Science 27 4%
Other 113 16%
Unknown 176 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 138. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2022.
All research outputs
#274,090
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#234
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#326
of 65,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.